Fiche du document
2014
- doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7246
- issn: 0098-7484
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1001/jama.2014.7246
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/25005653
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1538-3598
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_8A3E6DD23C0F6
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Citer ce document
D. Dvir et al., « Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1001/jama.2014.7246
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
IMPORTANCE: Owing to a considerable shift toward bioprosthesis implantation rather than mechanical valves, it is expected that patients will increasingly present with degenerated bioprostheses in the next few years. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation is a less invasive approach for patients with structural valve deterioration; however, a comprehensive evaluation of survival after the procedure has not yet been performed. OBJECTIVE: To determine the survival of patients after transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation inside failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Correlates for survival were evaluated using a multinational valve-in-valve registry that included 459 patients with degenerated bioprosthetic valves undergoing valve-in-valve implantation between 2007 and May 2013 in 55 centers (mean age, 77.6 [SD, 9.8] years; 56% men; median Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality prediction score, 9.8% [interquartile range, 7.7%-16%]). Surgical valves were classified as small (≤21 mm; 29.7%), intermediate (>21 and