An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1038/s41893-021-00696-5

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/2398-9629

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset/doi/10.7910/DVN/ZARR6A

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SNF/Careers/PP00P1_172891///

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_90B3B8FE1D163

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , All rights reserved , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer




Citer ce document

Martin Müller et al., « An evaluation of the sustainability of the Olympic Games », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1038/s41893-021-00696-5


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

The Olympic Games claim to be exemplars of sustainability, aiming to inspire sustainable futures around the world. Yet no systematic evaluation of their sustainability exists. We develop and apply a model with nine indicators to evaluate the sustainability of the 16 editions of the Summer and Winter Olympic Games between 1992 and 2020, representing a total cost of more than US$70 billion. Our model shows that the overall sustainability of the Olympic Games is medium and that it has declined over time. Salt Lake City 2002 was the most sustainable Olympic Games in this period, whereas Sochi 2014 and Rio de Janeiro 2016 were the least sustainable. No Olympics, however, score in the top category of our model. Three actions should make Olympic hosting more sustainable: first, greatly reducing the size of the event; second, rotating the Olympics among the same cities; third, enforcing independent sustainability standards.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en