The Benefit of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Bone Density and Microarchitecture Persists After its Withdrawal.
Fiche du document
- doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2695
- issn: 0021-972X
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1210/jc.2016-2695
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/27854548
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1945-7197
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_DD8055D4ADBF1
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Womyn Wimmin Woman Womon Human females Vertebrae, Lumbar Lumbar spine Older persons Older adults Seniors (Older people) Elderly people Old people Senior citizens Aging people Aged Women's work Diseases--ImagingCiter ce document
G. Papadakis et al., « The Benefit of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Bone Density and Microarchitecture Persists After its Withdrawal. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1210/jc.2016-2695
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) favorably affects bone mineral density (BMD). Whether MHT also affects bone microarchitecture, as assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS), has never been evaluated. Our objective was to assess the effect of MHT on TBS and BMD before and after its withdrawal. This was a cross-sectional study. This study included the general community. Data were collected from the OsteoLaus cohort (1500 women aged 50-80 years). After exclusion of women with bone-modulating treatments, 1279 women were categorized according to MHT status into current (CU), past (PU), and never (NU) users. Spine TBS and BMD at lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip were assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Age- and body mass index-adjusted analysis showed higher TBS values in CU vs PU or NU (1.31 ± 0.01, 1.29 ± 0.01, and 1.27 ± 0.01, respectively; P < .001). All BMD values were significantly higher in CU vs PU or NU. Compared to NU, PU exhibited higher lumbar spine (0.94 ± 0.01 vs 0.91 ± 0.01 g/cm(2); P = .017) and total hip (0.86 ± 0.01 vs 0.84 ± 0.01 g/cm(2); P = .026) BMD and a trend for higher TBS (P = .066). The 10-year loss of TBS and BMD at lumbar spine and total hip was significantly lower for both CU and PU vs NU. MHT duration had no effect on bone parameters. In PU, the residual effect on TBS and BMD was significantly more prominent in early discontinuers (