1999
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Penelope Corfield, « Court and anti-court. London and the British monarchy in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries », Mélanges de l'école française de Rome, ID : 10.3406/mefr.1999.4621
Pénélope J. Corfield, Court and anti-court. London and the British monarchy in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, p. 381-394. The essay argues that London needed the court to consolidate its commanding position as capital city - but that simultaneously the British monarchy needed to be in London. That created a complex and sometimes tense relationship. There was an anti-court tradition of hostility to the trappings of monarchy as well as a pro-court tradition of reverence for kingship. Many British monarchs built their own private palaces outside the metropolis but they could never move away entirely. Policentric and pluralist London, as the political, business, social and cultural capital of Britain, was also the inevitable home for the monarchy : kingship amidst the city crowds, courtiers among the citizens.