On husserlian eidetic variation and its duplicity: “contingency-variation” or “similarity-variation”?
Fiche du document
21 janvier 2020
- doi: 10.4000/alter.1369
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1249-8947
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2558-7927
All rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Citer ce document
De Santis Daniele, « On husserlian eidetic variation and its duplicity: “contingency-variation” or “similarity-variation”? », Alter, ID : 10.4000/alter.1369
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Whoever deals with the issue of eidos in Husserl’s phenomenology cannot repress an uncomfortable sensation due to the fact that, if on the one hand the Husserlian Denkweg unfolds itself unitarily, at least at the level of a certain number of basic methodological acquisitions (and eidetic analysis is to number among these), on the other hand the emergence of eidetic variation marks a decisive passage within the Husserlian conceptuality and methodology. Passage that usually, however, seems to r...