Perspectives of Young Adults on Receiving Telepsychiatry Services in an Urban Early Intervention Program for First-Episode Psychosis: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Survey Study
Fiche du document
2020
- handle: 10670/1.3ffdnf
- hal: hal-03694043
- doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00117
- PUBMEDCENTRAL: PMC7065530
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00117
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
information and communication technologies mhealth e-mental health mental health services psychiatry telemedicine homeless video -bio]/Human health and pathology/Psychiatrics and mental health -bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologieSujets proches
Young persons Young people Natural science Sciences Science of scienceCiter ce document
Shalini Lal et al., « Perspectives of Young Adults on Receiving Telepsychiatry Services in an Urban Early Intervention Program for First-Episode Psychosis: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Survey Study », HAL-SHS : sciences de l'information, de la communication et des bibliothèques, ID : 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00117
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Background: Limited knowledge exists on telepsychiatry in specialized services for first-episode psychosis (FEP), despite its potential for improving service access and engagement.Objective: To explore access and use of technology, obstacles to attending clinic appointments, and perspectives of young adults with FEP on using telepsychiatry as part of outpatient services.Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive survey study was conducted between July and October 2017 with young adults between the ages of 18 and 38 recruited from a specialized program for FEP in an urban Canadian setting. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.Results: Among 51 participants (mean age = 26.1, SD = 4.2; 59% male; 20% experiencing housing instability), more than half (59%, n = 30) rarely or never used mainstream video chat (e.g., Facetime). The majority (78%, n = 40) reported obstacles to attending appointments, with several (37%, n = 19) identifying two or more. Almost half (49%, n = 25) were very favorable towards telepsychiatry and a quarter (25%, n = 13) were somewhat favorable. Participants expressed several concerns about telepsychiatry, including loss of human contact and confidentiality.Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is a first study on the perspectives of individuals with FEP about telepsychiatry. Despite experiencing obstacles to attending appointments and expressing receptivity towards telepsychiatry, participants did not have access to these services. It is important to provide education to clinicians on the potential of telepsychiatry to improve service access. Also, more research is needed on when, where, and how telepsychiatry can be integrated into existing care while addressing patient and clinician concerns.