23 juin 2021
Martin Bartelmus, « Chapter 8. Breathing what? Solidarity! », Dark Hermeneutics, ID : 10670/1.4jnhov
Isn't it weird to claim that in one breath dark hermeneutics owes much to deconstruction and in the same breath it uses breath as a theoretical apparatus for language? Because breath and breathing is related to speaking, to language and that in turn is related to thinking. ((Kittler 2015, 17)) Does dark hermeneutics repeat the hermeneutical phonologozentrism? Is this now the short circuit which ends all talking about object-oriented ontology, poetics without human subjects etc.? Can philology...