Response from the authors of the article “Critical review of the role of personal protective Equipment (PPE) in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use” to the letter to the editor from the European crop protection association (ECPA) Occupational and bystander exposure expert group (OBEEG)
Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.4zheed
- hal: hal-03196197
- doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105191
- WOS: 000648879200006
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105191
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Agriculture Marketing authorisation Occupational health Personal protective equipment (PPE) Pesticides AgricultureSujets proches
Group dynamics Association Groups, Social ArticleCiter ce document
A. Garrigou et al., « Response from the authors of the article “Critical review of the role of personal protective Equipment (PPE) in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use” to the letter to the editor from the European crop protection association (ECPA) Occupational and bystander exposure expert group (OBEEG) », Archive ouverte de Sciences Po (SPIRE), ID : 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105191
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In March 2020, Safety Science published the article “Critical review of the role of PPE in the prevention of risks related to agricultural pesticide use” by an international group of researchers working for public research organisations. An expert group from an association representing the interests of the agricultural pesticide industry at European level (the European Crop Protection Association -ECPA-) then published a letter challenging the relevance of the discussion and the conclusions of this article. The authors of the review have decided to use their right to reply.