Negotiated windfalls: Mapping how public actors pursue and share land-value capture in Nanterre-la-Folie, France
Fiche du document
- handle: 10670/1.7dvks2
- hal: hal-04085923
- doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106704
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106704
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Sujets proches
Authorities, Public Public authorities Blind spot Disc, Optic Blindspot Optic papills Papills, Optic Administration Foliage Case Article Pomology Fruits Economic theory Political economy Competition (Economics) Economic competition Competitiveness (Economics) Urban planning Cities and towns--Planning Land use, Urban--Planning Urban development Redevelopment, Urban Land use, Urban--Management Slum clearance Civic planning Model cities Urban design City planning--Government policy Town planning Concentration (Psychology)Citer ce document
Morgan Mouton et al., « Negotiated windfalls: Mapping how public actors pursue and share land-value capture in Nanterre-la-Folie, France », HAL-SHS : architecture, ID : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106704
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This article seeks to broaden the scope of discussions pertaining to land-value capture (LVC). Scholars have nowaccumulated considerable documentation and analyses on how public authorities can (and whether they should)capture land-value increases that stem from actions other than the landowner’s. Little attention has been paid,however, to how public actors might compete for, and share the fruit of LVC. Using the case study of Nanterre-la-Folie, a district located in the vicinity of a new train station within the Grand Paris metropolitan area, we drawattention to the interplay of a variety of public actors (transit operators, local governments, national government)as they negotiate their share of transit-related LVC. In doing so, we show that the largely agreed-upon narrativeof LVC as public actors versus private ones leaves important aspects of planning in a blind spot. By drawingattention to public actors’ competition for transit-related LVC, we inform academic debates on metropolitangovernance and highlight implications for the unfolding and outcomes of real-estate projects.