The Value of a Life-Year and the Intuition of Universality

Fiche du document

Date

2022

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.26556/jesp.v22i3.1768

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licences

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess




Citer ce document

Marc Fleurbaey et al., « The Value of a Life-Year and the Intuition of Universality », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.26556/jesp.v22i3.1768


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

When considering the social valuation of a life-year, there is a conflict between two basic intuitions: on the one hand, the intuition of universality, according to which the value of an additional life-year should be universal, and, as such, should be invariant to the context considered; on the other hand, the intuition of complementarity, according to which the value of a life-year should depend on what this extra-life-year allows for, and, hence, on the quality of that life-year, because the quantity of life and the quality of life are complement to each other. This paper proposes three distinct accounts of the intuition of universality, and shows that those accounts either conflict with a basic monotonicity property, or lead to indifference with respect to how life-years are distributed within the population. Those results support the abandon of the intuition of universality. But abandoning the intuition of universality does not prevent a social evaluator from giving priority, when allocating life-years, to individuals with the lowest quality of life.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en