Medicine and Religion at the Early Modern Deathbed: How Can We Reframe the Narrative?

Fiche du document

Date

2022

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/26667711-20220001

Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess




Citer ce document

Maria Pia Donato, « Medicine and Religion at the Early Modern Deathbed: How Can We Reframe the Narrative? », HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques, ID : 10.1163/26667711-20220001


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé En

Since the 1960s, at a time when medicine was transforming Western conceptions of, and approaches to, the end of life, historians, historians of medicine, and specialists of religious studies have delved into death from a historical perspective. In the wake of historiens de la mentalité like Philippe Ariès and Michel Vovelle, studies commonly emphasise the limited autonomy of medicine vis-à-vis religion in conceptualising death and care for the dying. Only in the late eighteenth century, with Enlightenment culture and the secularization of society, were physicians supposedly encouraged to adopt a more active stance on the end of life. The aim of this paper is to survey recent scholarship that revisits the interaction of medicine and religion at the deathbed. In doing so, it presents an alternative to the rather dichotomous interpretation of the rise of medicine going hand in hand with the downfall of religion. It points to problems and sources that might be reconsidered in order to gain a more nuanced understanding of the interaction and reciprocal developments of medicine and religion in early modern Europe.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en