Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of boreal forest: Possible benefits of the TRIAD

Fiche du document

Date

2010

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
  • handle:  10670/1.b2obiw
  • Côté, Pascal; Tittler, Rebecca; Messier, Christian; Kneeshaw, D.D.; Fall, Andrew et Fortin, Marie-Josée (2010). « Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of boreal forest: Possible benefits of the TRIAD ». Forest Ecology and Management, 259, pp. 418-427.
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
http://archipel.uqam.ca/2626/

Ce document est lié à :
doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.10.038

Licence




Citer ce document

Pascal Côté et al., « Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of boreal forest: Possible benefits of the TRIAD », UQAM Archipel : articles scientifiques, ID : 10670/1.b2obiw


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Forest management has been criticised in the last 20 years for its negative impact on the native species, structures and functions of the forest. Of many possible alternatives proposed to minimize these effects, the functional zoning (or TRIAD) approach is gaining popularity in North America. The goal of this approach is to minimize the negative environmental impacts of forestry while maintain timber supply by dividing the forest into three broad land-use zones: (1) conservation, (2) ecosystemmanagement, and (3) wood production. In this study, we used a spatially explicit landscape model to simulate the effects of fire and six different forest management scenarios on a boreal mixedwood forest management unit in central Quebec. Themanagement scenarios examined included the current practices scenario, a scenario proposed by the provincial government, and four TRIAD scenarios varying in the amount of forest allocated to each of the three zones. For each scenario, we examined the harvest volume, percentage oldgrowth forest or old forest managed to favour old-growth attributes, and effective mesh size of forest patches by 20-year age classes. Withmore area set aside for conservation and high-retention partial cut harvesting techniques designed to maintain the attributes of old-growth stands, all TRIAD scenarios resulted in higher percentages of stands with old-growth attributes than the current practices scenario and the government proposed scenario, and two of the four TRIAD scenarios also resulted in higher harvest volume over the long term. All forest management scenarios resulted in significantly lower effective mesh size than the fire-only scenario, but this difference was not as pronounced for the four TRIAD scenarios as for the current practice and government proposed scenarios. We conclude that the TRIAD approach has the potential to minimize some of the negative impacts of forestry on the landscape, while maintaining timber supply over the long term.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en