Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: Examples from Bolivia and Netherlands
Fiche du document
1 mars 2024
- handle: 10670/1.ccm1pp
- hal: hal-04561780
- doi: 10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365
- WOS: 001175980900001
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//709747/EU/Joining Efforts for Responsible Research and Innovation/ERRI
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Deep Institutionalisation Responsible research and innovation Participatory Guarantee Systems Participatory society Markets TNO de facto responsible research and innovation rriSujets proches
Scientific research Science research Science--ResearchCiter ce document
Sally Randles et al., « Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: Examples from Bolivia and Netherlands », HAL-SHS : sociologie, ID : 10.1080/23299460.2024.2316365
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Our paper reprises the concept deep institutionalisation of responsible innovation considering why and how it matters to add the adjective ‘deep’. We distinguish de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) as the study of how actors frame and govern responsibility through existing practices (‘in the wild’) and investigate how these practices become institutionalised. We present a diagnostic framework comprising four axes which facilitates the critical and reflexive empirical interrogation of deep institutionalisation (DI). Deploying the framework, the paper explores DI in two very different cases: an inter-organisational case of Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) in Bolivia; and an intra-organisational case of societal engagement within TNO in the Netherlands. Controversially perhaps, we argue that normative features of responsibility are enacted, amplified and potentially institutionalised through markets. Both cases show how particular market features become recursively qualified through the four mutually reinforcing processes that comprise deep institutionalisation: (i) historical contingency; (ii) institutional amplification; (iii) systemic overflowing; and (iv)multi-level alignment.