Fiche du document
28 juin 2022
- handle: 10670/1.lp2vlc
- isbn: 978-3-031-06276-6
- hal: hal-04122943
- doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-06277-3
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-06277-3
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/licences/copyright/
Mots-clés
pluralisme religieux vérité logique érotétique relativisme Willard Van Orman Quine Gottlob Frege sous-détermination œcuménisme pluralité Stanislas Breton Francis Jacques staurologieCiter ce document
Philippe Gagnon, « Does Pluralism itself need to be Plural? », HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques, ID : 10.1007/978-3-031-06277-3
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Theology used to be the discipline that arbitrated and ‘said’ the truth. Some argued that its methodical engagement had to make it a search-driven experi-mentation with an inductive outlook intended at tracking truth through practice and praise, in short conversion. The empirico-formal sciences have sought canonical norms of knowledge away from any regimentation. Neopositivism had for a time entertained a fact-derived language and, as such, it banned metaphor as mingling problems by perpetuating the belief in entirely theoretical knowledge-terms. Here we aim at putting together an examination of some of the reasons why a pluralistic epistemology has come to be adopted, and an attempt at finding pluralistic responses to that very idea through interdisciplinary comparison.