Fiche du document
2021
- handle: 10670/1.syb5oz
- halshs: halshs-03502894
- doi: 10.1093/scipol/scab055
- WOS: 000736133500005
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/scipol/scab055
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Promises Futures Regimes of promising Emerging science and technologies Innovation policy Mission-oriented policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth/O.O3 - Innovation • Research and Development • Technological Change • Intellectual Property Rights/O.O3.O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences • Diffusion ProcessesSujets proches
Technological change Breakthroughs, Technological Innovations, Industrial Technological breakthroughs Technical innovations Innovations, TechnologicalCiter ce document
Douglas K. R. Robinson et al., « Enemies of the future? Questioning the regimes of promising in emerging science and technology », HAL-SHS : histoire, philosophie et sociologie des sciences et des techniques, ID : 10.1093/scipol/scab055
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This editorial introduces the basic idea and content of the special section ‘Enemies of the future? Questioning the regimes of promising in emerging science and technology’. It sheds light on how visions and stories of technological futures are being produced and, in combination, have stabilized into ‘regimes of promising’ that shape emerging technoscientific domains and guide research, innovation, and governance within these domains. The special section zooms in to particular illustrative instances that reveal the dynamics of the dominant regime of promising and also reveal how they are breaking down and in some cases being replaced by alternatives. The purpose of this special section is to show the importance of regimes of promising for research and innovation policy and to stimulate further discussions on alternative regimes of promising and their ramifications.