Procedural versus Opportunity-Wise Equal Treatment of Alternatives: Neutrality Revisited

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Collection

Archives ouvertes

Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess




Citer ce document

Ali Ihsan Ozkes et al., « Procedural versus Opportunity-Wise Equal Treatment of Alternatives: Neutrality Revisited », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10670/1.vb3bvs


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

We revisit the neutrality requirement in social choice theory. We propose a weakening of the standard neutrality condition, by allowing for different procedural treatment for different alternatives while entailing that alternatives enjoy same ex-ante possibility to be chosen. We compare these two conditions theoretically and computationally. Furthermore, we explore social choice problems in which this weakening resolves impossibilities that stem from a fundamental tension between neutrality and anonymity. Finally, we show that in certain social choice problems, this weakening provides an immediate refinement of anonymous, neutral, and Pareto optimal social choice rules towards retaining resoluteness.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en