F. Taroni

Discipline

Histoire, Philosophie et Sociologie des sciences (4) Science politique (1) Psychologie (1) Economies et finances (1) Anthropologie biologique (1)

Type de document

Articles (25) Colloques et conférences (1)

Type de document

Articles (2)

Co-auteur

Auteur

Date

Date

Source

Source

Mot-clé

Forensic sciences (11) Evidence (10) papier (9) Paper (9) ADN (8) abords (agglomération) (8) Value (8) Human beings (8) Evaluation (8) DNA (8) vraisemblance (8) analyse (7) évaluation (7) Analysis (7) Evaluation (7) décision (6) Will (6) Will (6) Utilization (6) intérêts (5) Reporting (5) Cases (5) Probabilities (5) Interest (5) Example (5) Discussion (5) Concepts (5) Cases (5) Person (5) personne (5)

Mot-clé

puits (1) substances-traces et résidus (1) technologie (1) persistance (1) papier (1) besoin (1) littérature (1) lumière (1) intérêts (1) information (1) analyse (1) évaluation (1) ADN (1) point (1) sujet (1) tribunal (1) crime (1) Reporting (1) DNA fingerprinting (1) Will (1) Views (1) Technology (1) Scientists (1) Population (1) Persistence (1) Paper (1) Literature (1) Light (1) Interest (1) Forensic scientists (1)

Documents écrit par F. Taroni (26) | parle de F. Taroni (2)

DNA transfer when using gloves in burglary simulations.
L. Carrara et al.
A probabilistic approach to evaluate salivary microbiome in forensic science when the Defense says: `It is my twin brother'.
S. Bozza et al.
The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
L. Samie et al.
Estimating the quantity of transferred DNA in primary and secondary transfers.
L. Samie et al.
The efficiency of DNA extraction kit and the efficiency of recovery techniques to release DNA using flow cytometry.
L. Samie et al.
Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: A coherent approach to inference and decision.
A. Biedermann et al.
Analysing and exemplifying forensic conclusion criteria in terms of Bayesian decision theory
A. Biedermann et al.
Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison – A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions
T. Hicks et al.
Towards a Bayesian evaluation of features in questioned handwritten signatures
L. Gaborini et al. (2017)
Reconsiderando la individualización forense como una decisión = Rethinking forensic individualization as a decision
A. Biedermann et al. (2017)
The consequences of understanding expert probability reporting as a decision.
A. Biedermann et al.
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings
R. Marquis et al.
Reframing the debate: a question of probability, not of likelihood ratio
A. Biedermann et al.
Analysis and evaluation of magnetism of black toners on documents printed by electrophotographic systems
A. Biedermann et al.
Probabilistic evaluation of n traces with no putative source: A likelihood ratio based approach in an investigative framework
I. De March et al.
The salivary microbiome for differentiating individuals: proof of principle.
S.L. Leake et al.
The decisionalization of individualization
A. Biedermann et al.
Rejoinder
F. Taroni et al.
Statistical hypothesis testing and common misinterpretations: should we abandon p-value in forensic science applications?
F. Taroni et al.
La naturaleza decisoria de las conclusiones de los expertos en ciencia forense (The decisionalization of individualization)
A. Biedermann et al. (2016)
The need for reporting standards in forensic science
A. Biedermann et al.
Prediction in forensic science: a critical examination of common understandings
A. Biedermann et al.
DNA, statistics and the law : a cross-disciplinary approach to forensic inference
A. Biedermann et al.
Estimating the time since discharge of spent cartridges: a logical approach fro interpreting the evidence
M. Gallidabino et al.
Analysing complex inference problems in forensic science using Bayesian networks: the example of the two-trace transfer problem
S. Gittelson et al.

next
L'individualizzazione come decisione
Alex Biedermann et al. (1 juin 2020)
Evaluation of Forensic DNA Traces When Propositions of Interest Relate to Activities : Analysis and Discussion of Recurrent Concerns
A. Biedermann et al. (12 déc. 2016)