E. von Elm

Discipline

Psychologie (6) Sciences de l'information et de la communication (3) Economies et finances (3) Education (1)

Type de document

Articles (46) Recensions (8)

Co-auteur

Date

Source

Mot-clé

recherche (34) Research (34) Research (34) Reporting (21) Human beings (19) procès (15) cohorte (15) information (14) Trials (14) Publications (14) Evidence (13) Design (13) Design (13) Reviews (12) Information resources--Reviews (12) Reference sources--Reviews (12) Theater--Reviews (12) Television programs--Reviews (12) Newspapers--Sections, columns, etc.--Reviews (12) Medical care (12) Discussion (12) Books--Reviews (12) littérature (11) santé (11) Methods (11) Will (11) Literature (11) Health (11) Evaluation (11) Discrimination (11)

Documents écrit par E. von Elm (46) | parle de E. von Elm (0)

A scoping review establishes need for consensus guidance on reporting health equity in observational studies.
X. Wang et al.
The RIPI-f (Reporting Integrity of Psychological Interventions delivered face-to-face) checklist was developed to guide reporting of treatment integrity in face-to-face psychological interventions.
J. Lopez-Alcalde et al.
Investigators' sense of failure thwarted transparency in clinical trials discontinued for poor recruitment.
P. Satalkar et al.
Expert guidance for COVID-19 vaccine deployment in Switzerland: a Delphi process.
K. Selby et al. (27 sept. 2021)
Comparison of randomized controlled trials discontinued or revised for poor recruitment and completed trials with the same research question: a matched qualitative study.
M. Briel et al. (30 déc. 2019)
Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study.
J.J. Meerpohl et al. (30 août 2019)
Resource use, costs, and approval times for planning and preparing a randomized clinical trial before and after the implementation of the new Swiss human research legislation.
B. Speich et al. (2019)
The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE).
S.M. Langan et al. (14 nov. 2018)
Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: A user study.
P. Przybyła et al.
Funding characteristics of randomised clinical trials supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation: a retrospective cohort study.
A. Amstutz et al. (2018)
Insufficient recruitment and premature discontinuation of clinical trials in Switzerland: qualitative study with trialists and other stakeholders.
M. Briel et al. (29 nov. 2017)
Discontinuation and non-publication of randomised clinical trials supported by the main public funding body in Switzerland: a retrospective cohort study.
A. Amstutz et al. (1 août 2017)
Switzerland voted against a universal basic income.
E. von Elm (16 janv. 2017)
Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
C.M. Schmucker et al. (2017)
Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.
I. Toews et al. (2017)
The reporting of studies using routinely collected health data was often insufficient.
L.G. Hemkens et al.
Das RECORD-Statement zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden [The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement]
E.I. Benchimol et al.
Reporting studies on time to diagnosis: proposal of a guideline by an international panel (REST).
E. Launay et al. (27 sept. 2016)
Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus.
D. Bassler et al. (2016)
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors.
N. Elia et al. (2016)
Premature Discontinuation of Prospective Clinical Studies Approved by a Research Ethics Committee - A Comparison of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies.
A. Blümle et al. (2016)
Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials.
B. Kasenda et al. (2016)
How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics Committee.
J.J. Kirkham et al. (2016)
Myocardial infarct size and mortality depend on the time of day-a large multicenter study.
S. Fournier et al.
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
E.I. Benchimol et al. (2015)

next