Update on the current opinion, status and future development of digital pathology in Switzerland in light of COVID-19.

Metadatas

type
Language
Identifiers
Relations

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207768

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/34518361

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1472-4146

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_AD00692E03553

Licenses

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY-NC 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/



Similar subjects En

Disease (Pathology)

Cite this document

V.H. Koelzer et al., « Update on the current opinion, status and future development of digital pathology in Switzerland in light of COVID-19. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207768


Metrics


Share / Export

Abstract 0

The transition from analogue to digital pathology (DP) in Switzerland has coincided with the COVID-19 crisis. The Swiss Digital Pathology Consortium conducted a national survey to assess the experience of pathologists in dealing with the challenges of the pandemic and how this has influenced the outlook and adoption of DP. A survey containing 20 questions relating to DP, personal experiences and challenges during the pandemic was addressed to Swiss pathologists at different experience stages in private practice, community and university hospitals. All 74 respondents were pathologists, with 81.1% reporting more than 5 years of diagnostic service experience. 32.5% reported having read 100 digital slides or more in a diagnostic context. 39.2% reported using whole slide imaging systems at their primary workplace. Key DP use cases before the COVID-19 lockdown were tumour boards (39.2%), education (60.8%) and research (44.6%), with DP used for primary diagnosis in 13.5%. During the COVID-19 crisis, the use of DP for primary diagnostics more than doubled (30% vs 13.5%), with internal consults as important drivers (22.5% vs 16.5%), while research use (25% vs 44.6%) and external consults (17.5% vs 41.9%) strongly decreased. Key challenges identified included a lack of established standard operating procedures and availability of specialised hardware and software. This survey indicates that the crisis acted as a catalyst in promoting DP adoption in centres where basic workflows were already established while posing major technical and organisational challenges in institutions that were at an early stage of DP implementation.

document thumbnail

From the same authors

On the same subjects

Export in