2010
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Gianfranco Agosti, « Paideia classica e fede religiosa: annotazioni sul linguaggio dei carmi epigrafici tardoantichi », Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz, ID : 10.3406/ccgg.2010.1733
Epigrahical epigrams of Late antique East (3rd-6th centuries CE) are often difficult to be interpreted from a religious point of view, due to their classicizing and highly formalised language. When archaeological context or external signs (like crosses, for ex.) are lacking, or they do not give clear informations on religious faith, poetical language shows a certain opacity and ambiguity. As a result, scholars’ opinions about religion of the same text can be qui te different (and the epigram can be labelled as Jew, Pagan or Christian). Detailed and closer analysis demonstrates that a) classicizing language was often simply a way of showing culture, with social and political purposes, especially in case of epigrams celebrating governors and public administrators, and in poetical epitaphs ; b) that poetical language could also discreetly carry signs of religious confession ; c) that ambiguity was sometimes a way of answering to expectations of multicultural communities. Especially from the end of 4th century CE, Christian epigrams share with highbrow literary poetry the same contrastive way of imitating and alluding to classical tradition ; it is an attitude of opposition to paganism even on the literary ground.