2016
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Henri Tréziny, « Des tours internes aux sanctuaires suburbains. Regards occidentaux sur des questions chypriotes », Cahiers du Centre d’Études Chypriotes, ID : 10.3406/cchyp.2016.1680
The sanctuary at Kition-Bamboula was bordered to the South by a fortification reinforced by a tower turned towards the North, that is towards the sanctuary. If the fortification was designed to defend the sanctuary, it must be admitted that it possessed “ internal” towers, turned towards the site that it defended, which would thus constitute an almost unicum. The interpretation relies on two parallels : Idalion (acropolis and “ palace”) and Palaepaphos (fortification at Marchello). We try to show, on the basis of West Mediterranean parallels, that for these two sites such an interpretation is, if not impossible, at least difficult to substantiate. The Bamboula walls must therefore have had external towers, as is the rule in the Greek and Phoenician worlds. It implies either that the fortification defended a building located further South, completely distinct from the sanctuary, or that it was part of the city walls, in which case the sanctuary was suburban, perhaps linked to the port activities.