Être et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital : le cas de l'agriculture

Fiche du document

Auteur
Date

2000

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Source

Économie rurale

Collection

Persée

Organisation

MESR

Licence

Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.

Mots-clés 0

Agricultural Law ; CAP ; Firm ; Family ; Capital ; Patrimony

Sujets proches En

Capital assets Fixed assets

Citer ce document

Denis Barthélemy, « Être et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital : le cas de l'agriculture », Économie rurale, ID : 10.3406/ecoru.2000.1108

Métriques

Partage / Export

Résumé En Fr

BEING AND HAVING PATRIMONY VERSUS CAPITAL IN AGRICULTURE The legal organisation of the farm may be viewed as the relative movement of two institutions: the firm (ensuring the growth of a capital) and the family (presiding over a patrimony designed to secure its long-term survival). An analysis of the farm lease legal regulations, of the policy with regard to farm structure and farm entry, and of the operating principles of the CAP, reveals the emergence of a capital rationality in contrast to the pre-existing patrimonial logic, accompanied by the submission of the firm to a patrimonial finality. This research brings out the lack of consistency characterising the concept of patrimony in economic analysis, echoing its individualising reduction at the level of legal concept.

FRE: Droit rural! PAC! Entreprise ! Famille ! Capital ! Patrimoine

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en