Fiche du document
1996
Copyright PERSEE 2003-2023. Works reproduced on the PERSEE website are protected by the general rules of the Code of Intellectual Property. For strictly private, scientific or teaching purposes excluding all commercial use, reproduction and communication to the public of this document is permitted on condition that its origin and copyright are clearly mentionned.
Sujets proches
Phrases and terms Phrases and terms Action plant Sensitiveplant Live-and-die (Plant) Mimosa pudica Touch-me-not (Plant) Humble plant Shame plant Langue d'oïl Style in dress Gramática comparada y general--Cuantificadores Arte de vestir Sensitive Sensitive pudique Mimosa pudique Quantification Quantifieurs Sciences de la gestion Gestion, Sciences de la Sciences de gestion Techniques de gestion Direction Management Locutions Termes Expressions (linguistique) Mots Vocables Mot Langue française Tendance (mode) Tendances vestimentaires Mode vestimentaire Styles vestimentaires Art de la mode Quantification Spécifieurs de quantité Quantifieurs honestumCiter ce document
Lucien Kupferman, « Les génitifs : gouvernement d'antécédent et gouvernement thématique », Langue française, ID : 10.3406/lfr.1996.5336
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Lucien Kupferman : Les génitifs : gouvernement d'antécédent et gouvernement thématique This study puts in question the so-called Cinque's generalization (Cinque, 1979) which views the Determiner position as an escape hatch for adnominal NPs. It is shown on empirical grounds and for principled reasons that the pronominal determiner son and clitic en materialize two heterogeneous types of movement, the first one being regulated by a-government, and the second one by θ-government. This analysis could be best achieved if we consider de-insertion as a syntactic move which is postereous to son formation and is insensitive to the argument-structure of the nominal. Son is best categorized as a genitive D⁰. En, as a pro-PP, more accurrately a P⁰-D⁰, is generated after de-insertion and is sensitive to the argument-structure of the nominal.