The “Churchill factor” and its influence on the Brexit debateDefining the Churchill myth

Fiche du document

Date

28 mars 2021

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1957-3383

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1775-4135

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licences

All rights reserved , info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess




Citer ce document

Alma-Pierre Bonnet, « The “Churchill factor” and its influence on the Brexit debateDefining the Churchill myth », Observatoire de la société britannique, ID : 10.4000/osb.4739


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Winston Churchill is undoubtedly one of the greatest British politicians of all time. His life spans the best part of the 20th century and his influence can still be felt today. Some key Brexit players, such as Nigel Farage, are Churchill admirers. Boris Johnson would even like to be seen as an heir to the great man’s legacy. However, according to Hugo Young, Churchill is at the heart of Britain’s misconception of Europe and of Britain’s delusion about itself. This illusion of grandeur, along with Britain’s misunderstanding of its place in the world, was instrumental in the Brexit result. This paper aims to discuss the way Churchill and his image have shaped Brexit. Churchill’s overbearing shadow, what we might call “the Churchill myth”, seems to have pervaded the Brexit debate as the result of the fateful referendum can be interpreted, in part, as Britain’s inability to come to terms with her glorious past. I will first define the Churchill myth to see that it fitted perfectly with the way Brexiters campaigned in the 2016 referendum. I will then try to understand what might be called “the Churchill factor”, that is, the way Brexiters made the most of the Churchill myth.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en