Networking Magic: Andrew Lang and the Science of Self-Interest

Fiche du document

Date

2013

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net ; no. 64 (2013)

Collection

Erudit

Organisation

Consortium Érudit

Licence

Copyright © SuprithaRajan, 2014


Sujets proches En

Sorcery Magick Spells Necromancy

Citer ce document

Supritha Rajan, « Networking Magic: Andrew Lang and the Science of Self-Interest », Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net, ID : 10.7202/1025672ar


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This article examines Andrew Lang’s anthropological writings on magic and religion in relation to a broader network of literary and sociological discourses. Lang’s work, along with that of others, highlights the labors nineteenth-century anthropologists expended to segregate magic from science, religion, and utilitarian action in the capitalist public sphere. Despite such efforts at segregation, however, nineteenth-century anthropological writings expose the genealogical continuities between magic, science, religion, and self-interest. These continuities, the essay contends, also surface in anthropology’s sibling discourses: literature and political economy. Lang’s contemporaries, such as H. Rider Haggard and Thomas Hardy, drew on anthropological findings in their fictional representations of magical rites and beliefs either in rural Britain or at the colonial periphery. Magic’s proximity to science, religion, and capitalist self-interest also undergirds Herbert Spencer’s systems theories and reverberates in the political economists that drew on Spencer’s work. The essay thus demonstrates not only how Lang functions as a node within a broad disciplinary network, but also how the concept of magic traverses numerous discursive fields.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en