The Benefits and Burdens of Engaging in Argumentation: Trans*feminist Reflections on Tuvel’s “In Defense of Transracialism”
Fiche du document
2018
- doi: 10.7202/1064073ar
Ce document est lié à :
Atlantis : Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice ; vol. 39 no. 2 (2018)
All Rights Reserved © Mount Saint Vincent University, 2018
Sujets proches
Argumentation Contending, Verbal Oral self-defense Disputing Argumentation Argumentation Ratiocination Argumentation Speaking Oratory, Primitive Argumentation Dialectic (Logic) Deduction (Logic) Deductive logic Logic, Deductive Argumentation Argumentation SpeakingCiter ce document
Stephanie Kapusta, « The Benefits and Burdens of Engaging in Argumentation: Trans*feminist Reflections on Tuvel’s “In Defense of Transracialism” », Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture and Social Justice / Atlantis: Études critiques sur le genre, la culture, et la justice, ID : 10.7202/1064073ar
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
After considering some ways of assessing argumentation, I present an ethical assessment of Tuvel's argument in her article “In Defense of Transracialism.” My claim is that some transgender women engaging with Tuvel are exposed to certain kinds of injustice associated with argumentational work, namely, disproportionate burdens and risk of psychological harm.