Readers' Disgust in the Case of Rebekah, Jacob, Isaac, and Esau: Perverters of Justice?

Fiche du document

Date

1 janvier 2020

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Organisation

SciELO




Citer ce document

Gerrie F. Snyman, « Readers' Disgust in the Case of Rebekah, Jacob, Isaac, and Esau: Perverters of Justice? », Old Testament Essays, ID : 10670/1.3trgdq


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Popular readings, for example, sermons appear to exonerate Rebekah and Jacob (Gen. 25: 19-34; Gen 27-29, 33), as if they want to salvage the relation between faith and good character. Scholarly readings are more ready to question Rebekah and Jacob on a continuum between Rebekah and Jacob as deceitful and rescuing the Abrahamic covenant. Who are to be regarded as the perpetrators perverting justice in this narrative? In this essay, I would optfor Esau as the injured party of the fraud perpetrated by his mother and brother. The argument starts with the notion of moral perversity as framed by the concept of moral injury as well as disgust expressed at moral digressions. This discussion will be followed by an explanation of four sermons on Jacob, Esau, Rebekah, and Isaac. The argument will be directed to a discussion of selected scholarly interpretations of the story cycle.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en