Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers?

Metadatas

Date

July, 2016

Discipline
type
Language
Identifiers
Relations

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011

Collection

Archives ouvertes



Similar subjects En

Payment--Law and legislation

Cite this document

Gwarlann de Kerviler et al., « Adoption of in-store mobile payment: Are perceived risk and convenience the only drivers? », HALSHS : archive ouverte en Sciences de l’Homme et de la Société - notices sans texte intégral, ID : 10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.011


Metrics


Share / Export

Abstract En

Smartphones are changing the way consumers shop, even in brick-and-mortar settings. This study explores consumers’ adoption of proximity mobile payment technology (p-m-payment), which enables them to pay with their smartphones for purchases in a physical store. With a perceived value perspective, the authors identify utilitarian, hedonic, and social benefits and financial and privacy risks as key drivers. They also investigate differences compared with the drivers of more familiar mobile shopping usages and highlight the role of experience. The paper discusses implications for both mobile and channel research and recommendations to help retailers take advantage of p-m-payment technology.

document thumbnail

From the same authors

On the same subjects

Within the same disciplines