On the presumed superiority of analytical solutions over numerical methods

Metadatas

Date

May 31, 2017

type
Language
Identifiers
Relations

This document is linked to :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s13194-016-0152-2

Collection

Archives ouvertes

License

info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess



Cite this document

Vincent Ardourel et al., « On the presumed superiority of analytical solutions over numerical methods », HAL-SHS : l'archive ouverte pour les sciences humaines et sociales, ID : 10.1007/s13194-016-0152-2


Metrics


Share / Export

Abstract En

An important task in mathematical sciences is to make quantitative predictions, which is often done via the solution of differential equations. In this paper, we investigate why, to perform this task, scientists sometimes choose to use numerical methods instead of analytical solutions. Via several examples, we argue that the choice for numerical methods can be explained by the fact that, while making quantitative predictions seems at first glance to be facilitated with analytical solutions, this is actually often much easier with numerical methods. Thus we challenge the widely presumed superiority of analytical solutions over numerical methods.

document thumbnail

From the same authors

On the same subjects

Within the same disciplines