Understanding the Church’s Past: Usuard’s Martyrology in Tenth-and Eleventh-century England. Medieval Worlds|Uses of the Past in Times of Transition: Forgetting, Using and Discrediting the Past & Approaches to Global Epigraphy, I - Volume 10. 2019 medieval worlds Volume 10. 2019|

Fiche du document

Date

28 novembre 2019

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Licence

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess



Sujets proches En

Community

Citer ce document

« Understanding the Church’s Past: Usuard’s Martyrology in Tenth-and Eleventh-century England. Medieval Worlds|Uses of the Past in Times of Transition: Forgetting, Using and Discrediting the Past & Approaches to Global Epigraphy, I - Volume 10. 2019 medieval worlds Volume 10. 2019| », Elektronisches Publikationsportal der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschafte, ID : 10.1553/medievalworlds_no10_2019s46


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

The ninth century witnessed the compilation of martyrologies in both the Latin Frankish world of the Carolingians and the vernacular world of Anglo-Saxon Wessex. Yet this phenomenon has been treated very differently by modern scholars of these two cultures. For Carolingianists these martyrologies represent a public, shared text, one which was read aloud in chapter as part of the daily life of religious communities across the Frankish kingdoms, and which, as Rosamond McKitterick has suggested, should be viewed as contributing to those communities’ understanding of their Christian past. For recent Anglo-Saxon scholars, the vernacular text known as the Old English Martyrology is rather a work compiled to support private, devotional reading, and better understood as an encyclopaedia of arcane information. This article investigates the reception of one Frankish compilation in tenth- and eleventh-century Anglo-Saxon England, that of Usuard, and compares it to that of the Old English Martyrology. It asks how far both texts should in fact be viewed as historical texts. It concludes with a case study of how they were both read in one late eleventh-century community, Exeter, and suggests that this community, at least, was able to maintain two overlapping but different views of its past and its place in wider Church history.

document thumbnail

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en