How to implement a participatory decision support for contaminated brownfield? A case study from France
Fiche du document
2019
- handle: 10670/1.a7aibc
- hal: hal-02500411
- doi: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1512476
- PRODINRA: 496236
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/09640568.2018.1512476
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
brownfield ELECTRE group decision participatory evaluation. Multicriteria Decision Aid (MCDA)Sujets proches
AssessmentCiter ce document
Marjorie Tendero et al., « How to implement a participatory decision support for contaminated brownfield? A case study from France », HAL-SHS : économie et finance, ID : 10.1080/09640568.2018.1512476
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Currently, participatory evaluation processes using multicriteria decision aids are barely used in the context of contaminated sites, even though they are a powerful tool for supporting land-use decision-making. The aim of this paper is to show how to apply such a participatory evaluation process (mixed methods) to the redevelopment of a contaminated brownfield site in France. Following the Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation (MODE), we designed a participatory process that enabled stakeholder empowerment to implement participatory multicriteria evaluations. We show that the (Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality) ELECTRE I method can be used to select consensus-based brownfield redevelopment projects and that such a participatory process can be implemented to ensure that feasible, coherent, and transparent choices are made for other brownfield redevelopment processes.