Disciplinary Practices As Social Manoeuvers: A Field Theory Alternative To Michael Burawoy’s Typology Of Knowledge

Fiche du document

Date

2 décembre 2015

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Organisation

University of Alberta

Licence

Copyright (c) 2015 Canadian Journal of Sociology


Mots-clés

Disciplinary practices Public sociology Knowledge production Intellectuals Experts

Sujets proches En

Social theory

Citer ce document

Julien Landry, « Disciplinary Practices As Social Manoeuvers: A Field Theory Alternative To Michael Burawoy’s Typology Of Knowledge », Canadian Journal of Sociology, ID : 10.29173/cjs21975


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

In his call for more public sociology, Michael Burawoy presents a generic framework to describe disciplinary structures in the social sciences. This model is based on a fourfold typology of knowledge which has been criticized by many. However, alternatives have fallen short of providing a convincing articulation of the social organisation and meaning of the intellectual practices the original typology was trying to describe. The debate on public sociology did not bridge differences in analytical beliefs about knowledge production and thus could not be expected to build a consensual disciplinary orientation. The current paper builds on field theory, organizational sociology, and interview data to frame the practices identified by Burawoy as social manoeuvers (i.e. ways of utilizing and legitimating knowledge) within specific social fields. In so doing, the paper provides a framework that is more flexible, more empirically adequate, and congruent with the sociology of science and the sociology of intellectuals and experts.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en