Fiche du document
1 janvier 2020
- handle: 10670/1.e804sp
Ce document est lié à :
10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.8
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sujets proches
Argumentation Contending, Verbal Oral self-defense Disputing Argumentation Unbelief Scepticism Argumentation Ratiocination Papers Argumentation Speaking Oratory, Primitive Argumentation Dialectic (Logic) Deduction (Logic) Deductive logic Logic, Deductive Argumentation Thesis writing Programs, Academic Universities and colleges--Dissertations Academic dissertations Theses Argumentation SpeakingCiter ce document
Scott F. Aikin, « What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong) », Co-herencia, ID : 10670/1.e804sp
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In this paper, I argue for three theses. First, that the problem of Deep Disagreement is usefully understood as an instance of the skeptical Problem of the Criterion. Second, there are structural similarities between proposed optimistic answers to deep disagreement and the problem of the criterion. Third, in light of these similarities, there are both good and bad consequences for proposed solutions to the problem of deep disagreement.