Rawlsianism and What Is Urgent

. In Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Rawls asserted that his conception of justice should provide guidance for a non-ideal theory of real-world injustices. Nonetheless, he established at the same time an enigmatic limit to his framing in which neither political philosophy nor justice as fairness should be understood as applied approaches. It is unclear how guidance against real-world injustices is possible, since it would presumably require insights into applied ethics. This paper focuses on drafting a possible alternative by offering a partially comprehensive reconstruction of the reasonable as a virtue. The hope is to use the virtue of reasonable citizens to transfer Rawlsian ponderations into a special kind of applied ethics controversies concerned with urgent public debates and resistance politics. The idea of this construction is to allow the virtue of the reasonable to establish a standard for citizen conduct.

Rawlsianism and What Is Urgent

Fiche du document

Mots-clés Und

Sujets proches En

Citer ce document

Métriques

Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines