In Whose Best Interests? Critiquing the “Family-as-Unit” Myth in Pediatric Ethics

Fiche du document

Date

1 janvier 2016

Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Organisation

Knowledge Unlatched

Licence

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode


Mots-clés

Science / Ethics bisacsh:SCI101000


Citer ce document

Joseph A. Raho, « In Whose Best Interests? Critiquing the “Family-as-Unit” Myth in Pediatric Ethics », Open Research Library, ID : 10.5772/66715


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

In pediatrics, parents are the presumed surrogate decision-makers for their children. Parents are generally obligated to make decisions in the child’s best interest. When assessing what is in the child’s best interests, parents should consider the child’s experience of illness, potential for suffering (physical or psychological), and ability to understand and tolerate treatment. Yet, parents may consider a variety of factors other than best interest when making treatment decisions for their children. Moreover, parents may equate the child’s best interest with their own (or their family’s) and make decisions that, in some situations, will place children at significant risk of serious harm. Clinicians may be reluctant to challenge parents due to a perception that their obligations require treating the family “as a unit.” After detailing a case from the author’s own practice in clinical ethics, this essay will challenge the view that “family-centered” (as opposed to “patient-centered”) care is an appropriate ethical model for pediatric decision-making. Specifically, the physician-patient relationship—or, in this context, the pediatrician-child relationship—ought not to be reconceptualized into the pediatrician-parent-child relationship, since the latter perspective potentially misidentifies who the patient is and may inadvertently suggest there is warrant for “treating” the family’s suffering at the expense of the child’s welfare.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en