Demystifying Hate Speech under the PEPUDA

Fiche du document

Date

1 janvier 2020

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
Organisation

SciELO




Citer ce document

J Geldenhuys et al., « Demystifying Hate Speech under the PEPUDA », PER: Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, ID : 10670/1.l41wnf


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

The factual matrix that is considered in each hate speech case differs from that in the next. However, certain factors always remain key in the process of balancing the different constitutional rights at play: who the victim is, who the perpetrator is and the nature of the expression. Additional factors to be considered in deciding whether an expression constitutes hate speech include: historical associations; who the utterer is as against the victim(s); the audience that is addressed and where the utterance is made; and the prevailing social conditions. How South African courts and the South African Human Rights Commission factor in these specific issues in assessing whether an utterance constitutes hate speech is examined in this contribution. Applicable international law principles and comparable foreign law reveal certain areas of the South African hate speech protection requiring refinement.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en