Fiche du document
2011
- handle: 10670/1.mvod7e
Cairn
Mots-clés
symbolic domination hegemony working class Bourdieu GramsciSujets proches
Domination politique Intersectionnalité Domination socialeCiter ce document
Michael Burawoy, « La domination est-elle si profonde ? Au-delà de Bourdieu et de Gramsci », Actuel Marx, ID : 10670/1.mvod7e
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
In this article, I examine Bourdieu’s conception of symbolic domination as based on misrecognition and compare it with Gramsci’s notion of hegemony based on consent. Drawing on research in workplaces in the US and Hungary I show how both theories are flawed. Gramsci does not appreciate the importance of mystification as a foundation for stable hegemony in advanced capitalism while Bourdieu’s notion of misrecognition, based on the notion of habitus, is too deep to comprehend the fragility of state socialist regimes. Comparative analysis, I argue, calls for a framework of domination that depends on a conception of homo ludens rather than homo habitus.