Fiche du document
2022
- handle: 10670/1.n0l0ij
- hal: hal-03549773
- doi: 10.1080/00346764.2022.2030542
- WOS: 000748821500001
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00346764.2022.2030542
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement//677407/EU/Soil Care for profitable and sustainable crop production in Europe/SOILCARE
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/ , info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
Mots-clés
Pollution perception pollution exposure avoidance behaviour mixed methods research pollution perception Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q53 - Air Pollution • Water Pollution • Noise • Hazardous Waste • Solid Waste • Recycling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation/Q.Q2.Q24 - Land Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation/Q.Q2.Q25 - WaterSujets proches
Environmental pollution Chemical pollution Pollution--Control Contamination of environmentCiter ce document
Pierre Levasseur et al., « Does pollution perception lead to risk avoidance behaviour? A mixed methods analysis », Archive Ouverte d'INRAE, ID : 10.1080/00346764.2022.2030542
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
This paper looks at three contaminated communities in southern Europe facing pollution from industrial and mining activity and analyses forms of avoidance behaviour, using both economic and sociological approaches. Based on a quantitative household survey, we show that avoidance behaviour is mainly explained by residential location and socio-economic characteristics. Pollution perception is not statistically correlated to most avoidance behaviour. From in-depth qualitative interviews, we learn more about people’s risk perception and whether and why people adopt avoidance behaviour, including discovering some inventive solutions. To conclude, our results cast doubt on the efficacy of current public advisory communications.