Why policies succeed or fail: the importance of 'policy consonance'

Fiche du document

Date

2025

Discipline
Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiant
  • 20.500.13089/13zeu
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2706-6274

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2679-3873

Ce document est lié à :
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13089/13zeq

Organisation

OpenEdition

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/




Citer ce document

Federico Toth, « Why policies succeed or fail: the importance of 'policy consonance' », International Review of Public Policy


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

This article takes stock of the literature on policy success and policy failure. The huge amount of studies on the subject does not provide a clear and agreed answer to the question: what determines the success or failure of a policy?The paper attempts to answer this question by introducing the analytical scheme of the 'policy pentagram'. The proposed framework conceives of public policies as consisting of five basic components: 1) policy goals; 2) policy instruments; 3) the organizational structure in charge of implementation; 4) the recipients of the policy; 5) policy communication.For a policy to be successful, there must be 'consonance' between its five components. Consonance does not indicate generic compatibility or the absence of contradictory elements: it indicates synergy and a high degree of complementarity between policy components, which thus end up mutually reinforcing each other. To show the practical usefulness of the policy pentagram framework, a concrete example is given: the experience of the Bologna breast milk bank.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines