2002
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1777-5345
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1157-996X
Ce document est lié à :
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13089/ed33
Ce document est lié à :
https://doi.org/10.4000/conflits.35
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Éric Alt, « La coopération judiciaire dans un « espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice » », Cultures & conflits
The EU's projected judicial organ, Eurojust, is evaluated. Eurojust will contribute to coordination of legal and criminal matters among member states ; it will replace the Corpus juris project, a simpler model of cooperation. Inadequacies of the EU's current system of legal and police cooperation are surveyed : a complex institutional structure, insufficient protection of fundamental rights, and ineffective opposition to major crime ; introducing Eurojust into this framework would not fix it. Corpus juris provides a European prosecutor to coordinate the initial phase of a transnational investigation, common definitions of several infractions, unified trial procedures, and a balance between efficiency and civil rights. The merits of Corpus juris are weighed against the disadvantages and rationalizations of Eurojust.