An Examination of Ranked Choice Voting in the United States, 2004-2022

Fiche du document

Date

27 janvier 2023

Type de document
Périmètre
Identifiant
  • 2301.12075
Collection

arXiv

Organisation

Cornell University




Citer ce document

Adam Graham-Squire et al., « An Examination of Ranked Choice Voting in the United States, 2004-2022 », arXiv - économie


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

From the perspective of social choice theory, ranked-choice voting (RCV) is known to have many flaws. RCV can fail to elect a Condorcet winner and is susceptible to monotonicity paradoxes and the spoiler effect, for example. We use a database of 182 American ranked-choice elections for political office from the years 2004-2022 to investigate empirically how frequently RCV's deficiencies manifest in practice. Our general finding is that RCV's weaknesses are rarely observed in real-world elections, with the exception that ballot exhaustion frequently causes majoritarian failures.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Sur les mêmes disciplines

Exporter en