J.J. Meerpohl

Discipline

Psychologie (3) Sciences de l'information et de la communication (1)

Type de document

Articles (19) Recensions (2)

Co-auteur

Date

Source

Mot-clé

recherche (17) Research (17) Research (17) protocole (12) procès (12) Reporting (11) Research--Moral and ethical aspects (11) Human beings (10) Committees (9) Trials (9) Committees (9) Publications (9) cohorte (9) information (8) Will (8) Discrimination (8) Will (8) littérature (7) analyse (7) Proportion (7) Literature (7) Evidence (7) Analysis (7) Reviews (6) Information resources--Reviews (6) Reference sources--Reviews (6) Theater--Reviews (6) Television programs--Reviews (6) Newspapers--Sections, columns, etc.--Reviews (6) Discussion (6)

Documents écrit par J.J. Meerpohl (19) | parle de J.J. Meerpohl (0)

Reporting quality of clinical trial protocols: a repeated cross-sectional study about the Adherence to SPIrit Recommendations in Switzerland, CAnada and GErmany (ASPIRE-SCAGE).
D. Gryaznov et al. (24 mai 2022)
Nonregistration, discontinuation, and nonpublication of randomized trials: A repeated metaresearch analysis.
B. Speich et al.
Reporting quality of trial protocols improved for non-regulated interventions but not regulated interventions: A repeated cross-sectional study.
S. Lohner et al.
Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects.
D. Gryaznov et al. (28 oct. 2020)
Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study.
J.J. Meerpohl et al. (30 août 2019)
Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.
I. Toews et al. (2017)
Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
C.M. Schmucker et al. (2017)
Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials.
B. Kasenda et al. (2016)
Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus.
D. Bassler et al. (2016)
Planning and reporting of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer trials.
S. Schandelmaier et al. (2015)
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications.
B. Kasenda et al. (16 juil. 2014)
Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries
C. Schmucker et al. (2014)
Prevalence, characteristics, and publication of discontinued randomized trials.
B. Kasenda et al. (2014)
Fate of clinical research studies after ethical approval--follow-up of study protocols until publication.
A. Blümle et al. (2014)
Protocol for a systematic review on the extent of non-publication of research studies and associated study characteristics.
S. Portalupi et al. (2013)
Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol.
M. Briel et al. (2013)
Defining publication bias: protocol for a systematic review of highly cited articles and proposal for a new framework.
K.F. Müller et al. (2013)
A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses.
C. Schmucker et al. (2013)
Detecting, quantifying and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analyses: protocol of a systematic review on methods.
K.F. Mueller et al. (2013)