Quick Annotator: an open-source digital pathology based rapid image annotation tool.

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/cjp2.229

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/34288586

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2056-4538

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_AE1D6CF05BEF3

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Sujets proches En

Disease (Pathology)

Citer ce document

R. Miao et al., « Quick Annotator: an open-source digital pathology based rapid image annotation tool. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1002/cjp2.229


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

Image-based biomarker discovery typically requires accurate segmentation of histologic structures (e.g. cell nuclei, tubules, and epithelial regions) in digital pathology whole slide images (WSIs). Unfortunately, annotating each structure of interest is laborious and often intractable even in moderately sized cohorts. Here, we present an open-source tool, Quick Annotator (QA), designed to improve annotation efficiency of histologic structures by orders of magnitude. While the user annotates regions of interest (ROIs) via an intuitive web interface, a deep learning (DL) model is concurrently optimized using these annotations and applied to the ROI. The user iteratively reviews DL results to either (1) accept accurately annotated regions or (2) correct erroneously segmented structures to improve subsequent model suggestions, before transitioning to other ROIs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of QA over comparable manual efforts via three use cases. These include annotating (1) 337,386 nuclei in 5 pancreatic WSIs, (2) 5,692 tubules in 10 colorectal WSIs, and (3) 14,187 regions of epithelium in 10 breast WSIs. Efficiency gains in terms of annotations per second of 102×, 9×, and 39× were, respectively, witnessed while retaining f-scores >0.95, suggesting that QA may be a valuable tool for efficiently fully annotating WSIs employed in downstream biomarker studies.

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en