Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study.

Fiche du document

Type de document
Périmètre
Langue
Identifiants
Relations

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/30478620

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1432-1238

Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_0E3027EAFAD97

Licences

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY-NC 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/




Citer ce document

M. Oddo et al., « Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6


Métriques


Partage / Export

Résumé 0

To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitative NPi and standard manual pupillary light reflex (sPLR)-blinded to clinicians and outcome assessors-were recorded in parallel from day 1 to 3 after CA. Primary study endpoint was to compare the value of NPi versus sPLR to predict 3-month Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), dichotomized as favorable (CPC 1-2: full recovery or moderate disability) versus unfavorable outcome (CPC 3-5: severe disability, vegetative state, or death). At any time between day 1 and 3, an NPi ≤ 2 (n = 456 patients) had a 51% (95% CI 49-53) negative predictive value and a 100% positive predictive value [PPV; 0% (0-2) false-positive rate], with a 100% (98-100) specificity and 32% (27-38) sensitivity for the prediction of unfavorable outcome. Compared with NPi, sPLR had significantly lower PPV and significantly lower specificity (p  

document thumbnail

Par les mêmes auteurs

Sur les mêmes sujets

Exporter en