Early discrimination of cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness: pitfalls and clues.
Fiche du document
- doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10125-w
- issn: 0340-5354
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00415-020-10125-w
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/32754829
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1432-1459
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_8F9563B252456
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sujets proches
Cerebrum Mind Animal behavior Habits and behaviorCiter ce document
A. Pincherle et al., « Early discrimination of cognitive motor dissociation from disorders of consciousness: pitfalls and clues. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1007/s00415-020-10125-w
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Bedside assessment of consciousness and awareness after a severe brain injury might be hampered by confounding clinical factors (i.e., pitfalls) interfering with the production of behavioral or motor responses to external stimuli. Despite the use of validated clinical scales, a high misdiagnosis rate is indeed observed. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 49 patients with severe brain injury admitted to an acute neuro-rehabilitation program. Patients' behavior was assessed using the Motor Behavior Tool and Coma Recovery Scale Revised. All patients underwent systematic assessment for pitfalls including polyneuropathy and/or myopathy and/or myelopathy, major cranial nerve palsies, non-convulsive status epilepticus, aphasia (expressive or comprehensive), cortical blindness, thalamic involvement and frontal akinetic syndrome. A high prevalence (75%) of pitfalls potentially interfering with sensory afference (polyneuropathy, myopathy, myelopathy, and sensory aphasia), motor efference (polyneuropathy, myopathy, motor aphasia, and frontal akinetic syndrome), and intrinsic brain activity (thalamic involvement and epilepsy) was found. Nonetheless, the motor behavior tool identified residual cognition (i.e. a cognitive motor dissociation condition) regardless of the presence of these pitfalls in 70% of the patients diagnosed as unresponsive using the Coma Recovery Scale Revised. On one hand, pitfalls might contribute to misdiagnosis. On the other, it could be argued that they are clues for diagnosing cognitive motor dissociation rather than true disorders of consciousness given their prominent effect on the sensory-motor input-output balance.