Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Fiche du document
2022
- doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2
- issn: 1178-1653
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/35067858
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1178-1661
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SNF//407440_183447///
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UNIL/////
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_C1CCCADF656C1
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY-NC 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Mots-clés
Choice Behavior; Focus Groups; Humans; Patient Preference; Surveys and Questionnaires; SwitzerlandSujets proches
Care and treatment Focused group interviewing Groups, FocusCiter ce document
A. Nicolet et al., « Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attributes, we performed a review of the DCE literature in healthcare with a focus on chronic care. Next, attribute selection involved stakeholders (N = 7) from various healthcare sectors to select the most relevant and actionable attributes, followed by three organized focus groups involving the general public and patients (N = 21) to verify the selection and the clarity of the DCE tasks and explanations. Finally, we conducted an online pilot in the target population to test the survey and obtain priors for a final six tested attributes to refine the final design of the experiment. After identifying an initial 33 attributes, a final list of six attributes was selected following stakeholder involvement and the three focus groups involving the target population. At the online pilot-testing stage with 301 participants, the majority of respondents found the DCE choice tasks socially relevant for Switzerland but challenging. The quality of the answers was relatively high. Most attributes had signs matching those in the literature and focus group discussions. This article will be useful to researchers designing DCEs from a broad health policy perspective. The multistage approach involving a range of stakeholders was essential for the development of a DCE that is relevant for policy makers and well-accepted by the general public and patients.