Between the genotype and the phenotype lies the microbiome: symbiosis and the making of ‘postgenomic’ knowledge
Fiche du document
6 décembre 2023
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s40656-023-00599-y
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0391-9714
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1742-6316
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/SNF/Careers/185822///
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_B87533BC47BE4
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Sujets proches
PapersCiter ce document
Fasel Cécile et al., « Between the genotype and the phenotype lies the microbiome: symbiosis and the making of ‘postgenomic’ knowledge », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1007/s40656-023-00599-y
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
AbstractEmphatic claims of a “microbiome revolution” aside, the study of the gut microbiota and its role in organismal development and evolution is a central feature of so-called postgenomics; namely, a conceptual and/or practical turn in contemporary life sciences, which departs from genetic determinism and reductionism to explore holism, emergentism and complexity in biological knowledge-production. This paper analyses the making of postgenomic knowledge about developmental symbiosis in Drosophila melanogaster by a specific group of microbiome scientists. Drawing from both practical philosophy of science and Science and Technology Studies, the paper documents epistemological questions of artefactuality and representativeness of model organisms as they emerge in the day-to-day labour producing and being produced by the “microbiome revolution." Specifically, the paper builds on all the written and editorial exchanges involved in the troubled publication of a research paper studying the symbiotic role of the microbiota in the flies’ development. These written materials permit us to delimit the network of justifications, evidence, standards of knowledge-production, trust in the tools and research designs that make up the conditions of possibility of a postgenomic fact. More than reframing the organism as a radically novel multiplicity of reactive genomes, we conclude, doing postgenomic research on the microbiota and symbiosis means producing a story that deviates from the scripts embedded into the sociotechnical experimental systems of post-Human Genome Project life sciences.