Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.diii.2022.07.003
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/35961843
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/2211-5684
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_7D1C486667303
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
S. Sridi et al., « Improved myocardial scar visualization with fast free-breathing motion-compensated black-blood T1-rho-prepared late gadolinium enhancement MRI. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1016/j.diii.2022.07.003
Clinical guidelines recommend the use of bright-blood late gadolinium enhancement (BR-LGE) for the detection and quantification of regional myocardial fibrosis and scar. This technique, however, may suffer from poor contrast at the blood-scar interface, particularly in patients with subendocardial myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical performance of a two-dimensional black-blood LGE (BL-LGE) sequence, which combines free-breathing T 1 -rho-prepared single-shot acquisitions with an advanced non-rigid motion-compensated patch-based reconstruction. Extended phase graph simulations and phantom experiments were performed to investigate the performance of the motion-correction algorithm and to assess the black-blood properties of the proposed sequence. Fifty-one patients (37 men, 14 women; mean age, 55 ± 15 [SD] years; age range: 19-81 years) with known or suspected cardiac disease prospectively underwent free-breathing T 1 -rho-prepared BL-LGE imaging with inline non-rigid motion-compensated patch-based reconstruction at 1.5T. Conventional breath-held BR-LGE images were acquired for comparison purposes. Acquisition times were recorded. Two readers graded the image quality and relative contrasts were calculated. Presence, location, and extent of LGE were evaluated. BL-LGE images were acquired with full ventricular coverage in 115 ± 25 (SD) sec (range: 64-160 sec). Image quality was significantly higher on free-breathing BL-LGE imaging than on its breath-held BR-LGE counterpart (3.6 ± 0.7 [SD] [range: 2-4] vs. 3.9 ± 0.2 [SD] [range: 3-4]) (P