Fiche du document
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110552
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/0165-1765
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_971AE0AD9BDD1
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , CC BY 4.0 , https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Mots-clés
Economics and Econometrics; FinanceSujets proches
Amusements Children--Recreation Games for children Pastimes Primitive games Recreations Games, Primitive Children's gamesCiter ce document
Simon Gächter et al., « Social closeness can help, harm and be irrelevant in solving pure coordination problems », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110552
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
Experimental research has shown that ordinary people often perform remarkably well in solving coordination games that involve no conflicts of interest. While most experiments in the past studied such coordination games among socially distant anonymous players, here we study behaviour in a set of two player coordination games and compare the outcomes depending on whether the players are socially close or socially distant. We find that social closeness influences prospects for coordination, but whether it helps, harms, or has no impact on coordination probabilities, depends on the structure of the game.