Fiche du document
2009
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.026
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/19615916
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1873-734X[electronic]
Ce document est lié à :
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/urn/urn:nbn:ch:serval-BIB_F2CD022A8FD08
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess , Copying allowed only for non-profit organizations , https://serval.unil.ch/disclaimer
Sujets proches
Blood--FlowCiter ce document
L.K. von Segesser et al., « Superior flow for bridge to life with self-expanding venous cannulas. », Serveur académique Lausannois, ID : 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.026
Métriques
Partage / Export
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Recently, a compact cardiopulmonary support (CPS) system designed for quick set-up for example, during emergency cannulation, has been introduced. Traditional rectilinear percutaneous cannulas are standard for remote vascular access with the original design. The present study was designed to assess the potential of performance increase by the introduction of next-generation, self-expanding venous cannulas, which can take advantage of the luminal width of the venous vasculature despite a relatively small access orifice. METHODS: Veno-arterial bypass was established in three bovine experiments (69+/-10 kg). The Lifebridge (Lifebridge GmbH, Munich, Germany) system was connected to the right atrium in a trans-jugular fashion with various venous cannulas; and the oxygenated blood was returned through the carotid artery with a 17 F percutaneous cannula. Two different venous cannulas were studied, and the correlation between the centrifugal pump speed (1500-3900 RPM), flow and the required negative pressure on the venous side was established: (A) Biomedicus 19 F (Medtronic, Tolochenaz, Switzerland); (B) Smart canula 18 F/36 F (Smartcanula LLC, Lausanne, Switzerland). RESULTS: At 1500 RPM, the blood flow was 0.44+/-0.26 l min(-1) for the 19 F rectilinear cannula versus 0.73+/-0.34 l min(-1) for the 18/36 F self-expanding cannula. At 2500 RPM the blood flow was 1.63+/-0.62 l min(-1) for the 19F rectilinear cannula versus 2.13+/-0.34 l min(-1) for the 18/36 F self-expanding cannula. At 3500 RPM, the blood flow was 2.78+/-0.47 l min(-1) for the 19 F rectilinear cannula versus 3.64+/-0.39 l min(-1) for the 18/36 F self-expanding cannula (p